Viable Arguments Against Evolution Theories
The development of living things and the universe at large has been a center of conflict between religious people and scientists. Christians believe that God created everything in a six day period as denoted in Genesis within the bible. Scientists believe evolution took place. In this perspective, several arguments against evolution theories have been advanced to reject the general scientific view.
The first argument is that living things come from their own. There is no way they could have developed from non living things. The general view is that there has to be a parent of opposite sex for life to come about. These theories on the other hand state otherwise and they have no proof to support their claim; just word of mouth.
Others propose that the earth and the entire universe came into existence on its own. They base this claim on gravitational force at work. This is highly unlikely since there is no way deformed matters can transform themselves into well organized ones. For this to happen there has to be the influence of a rational force behind all these.
In this perspective, it is not logical for matters to pile up on their own into well formed and organized things. There has to be an intellectual force behind this and at this point, God comes into the picture. He is the creator of earth, sky and all that are in it as stated in the first book of the bible. The idea of gravitational force is unrealistic since with the passage of time, it should have declined in strength as of today.
Besides, everything that is undergoing change will always move from orderly to disorderly and not the other way round. Scientists believe in the other way round. The universe is still in transition. This is basically from an orderly state to deformation with the passage of time. There is no way that the vice-verse part could have resulted into an orderly and well shaped universe as these people say so.
The aspect of alteration is another base for their theories. This one says that human beings mutated from animals of the baboon family with the passage of time. This is not possible since mutation leads to formation of new generic matter; something similar to the original body and not totally different in any way. As of such the conclusion of this is that it is not viable and as already mentioned in the previous paragraphs, nothing can move from disorderly to that of orderly manner.
Others have their basis on cell division within the bodies of living things. This process is too slow. In addition to this, the new cell is simply a replica of the original matter. This beats logic of this theory where rampant division of cells could have brought about human beings.
All in all, arguments against evolution theories and those in support clearly point to an existence of a party of high intelligent nature which caused all these happenings to occur and give rise to man. In Christian view, it is God who did all these work. Everything in existence is a good source of opposition to all these. Creation took place under the influence of the most high.
The first argument is that living things come from their own. There is no way they could have developed from non living things. The general view is that there has to be a parent of opposite sex for life to come about. These theories on the other hand state otherwise and they have no proof to support their claim; just word of mouth.
Others propose that the earth and the entire universe came into existence on its own. They base this claim on gravitational force at work. This is highly unlikely since there is no way deformed matters can transform themselves into well organized ones. For this to happen there has to be the influence of a rational force behind all these.
In this perspective, it is not logical for matters to pile up on their own into well formed and organized things. There has to be an intellectual force behind this and at this point, God comes into the picture. He is the creator of earth, sky and all that are in it as stated in the first book of the bible. The idea of gravitational force is unrealistic since with the passage of time, it should have declined in strength as of today.
Besides, everything that is undergoing change will always move from orderly to disorderly and not the other way round. Scientists believe in the other way round. The universe is still in transition. This is basically from an orderly state to deformation with the passage of time. There is no way that the vice-verse part could have resulted into an orderly and well shaped universe as these people say so.
The aspect of alteration is another base for their theories. This one says that human beings mutated from animals of the baboon family with the passage of time. This is not possible since mutation leads to formation of new generic matter; something similar to the original body and not totally different in any way. As of such the conclusion of this is that it is not viable and as already mentioned in the previous paragraphs, nothing can move from disorderly to that of orderly manner.
Others have their basis on cell division within the bodies of living things. This process is too slow. In addition to this, the new cell is simply a replica of the original matter. This beats logic of this theory where rampant division of cells could have brought about human beings.
All in all, arguments against evolution theories and those in support clearly point to an existence of a party of high intelligent nature which caused all these happenings to occur and give rise to man. In Christian view, it is God who did all these work. Everything in existence is a good source of opposition to all these. Creation took place under the influence of the most high.
About the Author:
If you are looking for arguments against evolution, visit the web pages at daywithoutyesterday.net today. You can read and consider the discussion at http://daywithoutyesterday.net now.
