Information On Constitutional Republic Vs Democracy
Republican and democratic parties are the parties that are popularly known all over the world. People are given freedom to follow the party they have believe in. Each party aims at increasing the number of members. This is done through the campaigns to create awareness to the public. Each party has members who represent them in all regions. Outlined below are findings on the constitutional republic vs democracy.
A nation that applies the democratic style of ruling will give its members a chance to enjoy the political education that the government offers. The training is free and gives the public the opportunity to learn how the government carries its operations on daily bases. The interest of the citizens is given the first priority as the government is for the people by the people. Equality of all citizens is maintained. The law states that no one is above the law.
There is responsibility and stability in the general administration in a state that uses a democratic type of government. There are minimal causes of revolution as citizens and government is pleased with this type ruling. This form of government is stable hence economic growth.
However, countries that apply this form of government have challenges that make it hard to function properly. Democratic method of ruling is a quantitative method. It only emphasizes on numerical figures of majority in the country. Citizens are after quality and productive leaders who will help them to develop their economy. The method uses the rule of unskilled and incompetent leaders.
The citizens elect a leader in a republican country. This ensures fair running of government. Since the citizens have elected leaders who they share the same vision, they both participate in running of a government. The leaders work hand in hand with the local citizen in development projects. This method of ruling fosters economic growth in the country. This is because the elected leaders present the problem their citizens are going through and ensure they are solved.
In the land where republican is applied, all the people and the government are accountable under the law. The rights of all citizens are recognized individually under the law and not of majority people. When it comes to making of laws in land, the bill is thoroughly scrutinized before passing it into a law. The separation of power makes it easy to monitor all the systems of a government.
There are also demerits of having a republican style of government. The main one is this method makes it hard to implement. Non-government officials are too involved in running of the government. Such a method of ruling makes a government vulnerable to those who want to satisfy their own agenda. Such disruption of normal government activities is costly.
To conclude on the above, a nation needs to incorporate both ruling styles to attain the set goals and standards. The amending of the constitution should involve the whole nation. Charismatic leaders should be elected for effective ruling.
A nation that applies the democratic style of ruling will give its members a chance to enjoy the political education that the government offers. The training is free and gives the public the opportunity to learn how the government carries its operations on daily bases. The interest of the citizens is given the first priority as the government is for the people by the people. Equality of all citizens is maintained. The law states that no one is above the law.
There is responsibility and stability in the general administration in a state that uses a democratic type of government. There are minimal causes of revolution as citizens and government is pleased with this type ruling. This form of government is stable hence economic growth.
However, countries that apply this form of government have challenges that make it hard to function properly. Democratic method of ruling is a quantitative method. It only emphasizes on numerical figures of majority in the country. Citizens are after quality and productive leaders who will help them to develop their economy. The method uses the rule of unskilled and incompetent leaders.
The citizens elect a leader in a republican country. This ensures fair running of government. Since the citizens have elected leaders who they share the same vision, they both participate in running of a government. The leaders work hand in hand with the local citizen in development projects. This method of ruling fosters economic growth in the country. This is because the elected leaders present the problem their citizens are going through and ensure they are solved.
In the land where republican is applied, all the people and the government are accountable under the law. The rights of all citizens are recognized individually under the law and not of majority people. When it comes to making of laws in land, the bill is thoroughly scrutinized before passing it into a law. The separation of power makes it easy to monitor all the systems of a government.
There are also demerits of having a republican style of government. The main one is this method makes it hard to implement. Non-government officials are too involved in running of the government. Such a method of ruling makes a government vulnerable to those who want to satisfy their own agenda. Such disruption of normal government activities is costly.
To conclude on the above, a nation needs to incorporate both ruling styles to attain the set goals and standards. The amending of the constitution should involve the whole nation. Charismatic leaders should be elected for effective ruling.
About the Author:
To choose between constitutional republic vs democracy, you should first read the following blog. Get all the specifics by clicking on this link http://www.myamericamyhome.net.
